Stage-oe-small.jpg

Inproceedings3507: Unterschied zwischen den Versionen

Aus Aifbportal
Wechseln zu:Navigation, Suche
(Die Seite wurde neu angelegt: „{{Publikation Erster Autor |ErsterAutorNachname=Flöck |ErsterAutorVorname=Fabian }} {{Publikation Author |Rank=2 |Author=David Laniado }} {{Publikation Author |R…“)
 
 
Zeile 16: Zeile 16:
 
}}
 
}}
 
{{Inproceedings
 
{{Inproceedings
|Referiert=False
+
|Referiert=True
 
|Title=Towards Better Visual Tools for Exploring Wikipedia Article Development – The Use Case of “Gamergate Controversy”
 
|Title=Towards Better Visual Tools for Exploring Wikipedia Article Development – The Use Case of “Gamergate Controversy”
 
|Year=2015
 
|Year=2015
 
|Month=April
 
|Month=April
 
|Booktitle=WIKIPEDIA, A SOCIAL PEDIA: RESEARCH CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES
 
|Booktitle=WIKIPEDIA, A SOCIAL PEDIA: RESEARCH CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES
|Organization= Workshop on Wikipedia, a Social Pedia: Research Challenges and Opportunities
+
|Organization=Workshop on Wikipedia, a Social Pedia: Research Challenges and Opportunities
 
|Publisher=AAAI Digital Library
 
|Publisher=AAAI Digital Library
 
}}
 
}}
Zeile 28: Zeile 28:
 
gathering news media attention. We show how our tools can be used to visually explore editor disagreement interactions and networks, as well as conflicted content and provenance, and present some of the results. We argue that these individual tools could benefit from synergies by combining them and lay out a possible architecture for doing so.
 
gathering news media attention. We show how our tools can be used to visually explore editor disagreement interactions and networks, as well as conflicted content and provenance, and present some of the results. We argue that these individual tools could benefit from synergies by combining them and lay out a possible architecture for doing so.
 
|Link=http://www.aaai.org/ocs/index.php/ICWSM/ICWSM15/paper/view/10656
 
|Link=http://www.aaai.org/ocs/index.php/ICWSM/ICWSM15/paper/view/10656
|Forschungsgruppe=Web Science und Wissensmanagement
+
|Forschungsgruppe=Web Science
 
}}
 
}}

Aktuelle Version vom 30. April 2018, 16:47 Uhr


Towards Better Visual Tools for Exploring Wikipedia Article Development – The Use Case of “Gamergate Controversy”


Towards Better Visual Tools for Exploring Wikipedia Article Development – The Use Case of “Gamergate Controversy”



Published: 2015 April

Buchtitel: WIKIPEDIA, A SOCIAL PEDIA: RESEARCH CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES
Verlag: AAAI Digital Library
Organisation: Workshop on Wikipedia, a Social Pedia: Research Challenges and Opportunities

Referierte Veröffentlichung

BibTeX

Kurzfassung
We present a comparative analysis of three tools for visually exploring the revision history of a Wikipedia article. We do so on the use case of “Gamergate Controversy”, an article that has been the setting of a major editor dispute in the last half of 2014 and early 2015, resulting in multiple editor bans and gathering news media attention. We show how our tools can be used to visually explore editor disagreement interactions and networks, as well as conflicted content and provenance, and present some of the results. We argue that these individual tools could benefit from synergies by combining them and lay out a possible architecture for doing so.

Weitere Informationen unter: Link



Forschungsgruppe

Web Science


Forschungsgebiet