DAAD PPP USA (Stanford): Unterschied zwischen den Versionen
K (Added from ontology) |
Hle (Diskussion | Beiträge) |
||
| Zeile 3: | Zeile 3: | ||
|Name=Reuse of Ontologies - Advanced Ontology Rating with Protege | |Name=Reuse of Ontologies - Advanced Ontology Rating with Protege | ||
|Name EN=Reuse of Ontologies - Advanced Ontology Rating with Protege | |Name EN=Reuse of Ontologies - Advanced Ontology Rating with Protege | ||
| − | |Beschreibung DE=The project is jointly performed by Universität Karlsruhe (TH) and Stanford University, CA, US. | + | |Beschreibung DE=The project is jointly performed by Universität Karlsruhe (TH) and Stanford University, CA, US. The basic idea of Open Rating Systems is to have a democratic approach to rating where anyone can review pieces of content. The real power of this approach lies in the concept of metarating: users can rate not only the content itself but also reviews of the content provided by others. Many people are now familiar with “Was this review helpful to you'' button on many rating sites. This concept has proven highly successful and is currently employed at Epinions , Slashdot , Amazon (in the user review section), iTunes (to review music), and other sites. The real benefit would lie in the integration into an ontology editor itself directly, because that is the place people will start looking for ontologies to reuse. The goal of the project is to enable reuse of ontologies by implementing an advanced open rating system as part of the well-known ontology editor Protege. |
| − | + | |Beschreibung EN=The project is jointly performed by Universität Karlsruhe (TH) and Stanford University, CA, US. The basic idea of Open Rating Systems is to have a democratic approach to rating where anyone can review pieces of content. The real power of this approach lies in the concept of metarating: users can rate not only the content itself but also reviews of the content provided by others. Many people are now familiar with “Was this review helpful to you'' button on many rating sites. This concept has proven highly successful and is currently employed at Epinions , Slashdot , Amazon (in the user review section), iTunes (to review music), and other sites. The real benefit would lie in the integration into an ontology editor itself directly, because that is the place people will start looking for ontologies to reuse. The goal of the project is to enable reuse of ontologies by implementing an advanced open rating system as part of the well-known ontology editor Protege. | |
| − | The basic idea of Open Rating Systems is to have a democratic approach to rating where anyone can review pieces of content. The real power of this approach lies in the concept of metarating: users can rate not only the content itself but also reviews of the content provided by others. Many people are now familiar with | + | |Start=Januar 1, 2007 |
| − | + | |Ende=Dezember 31, 2008 | |
| − | The goal of the project is to enable reuse of ontologies by implementing an advanced open rating system as part of the well-known ontology editor Protege. | + | |Finanziert von=DAAD |
| − | |Beschreibung EN=The project is jointly performed by Universität Karlsruhe (TH) and Stanford University, CA, US. | + | |Projektstatus=abgeschlossen |
| − | + | |Person=Holger Lewen, Peter Haase, York Sure, | |
| − | The basic idea of Open Rating Systems is to have a democratic approach to rating where anyone can review pieces of content. The real power of this approach lies in the concept of metarating: users can rate not only the content itself but also reviews of the content provided by others. Many people are now familiar with | + | |Forschungsgruppe=Wissensmanagement |
| − | + | |Partner=Stanford | |
| − | The goal of the project is to enable reuse of ontologies by implementing an advanced open rating system as part of the well-known ontology editor Protege. | + | |Vorgängerprojekt= |
| − | |Start= | + | |Forschungsgebiet=Ontologiemodellierungsmethodology , Semantic Web Infrastructure, Semantic Web, Ontologiemodellierung, Ontologiemanagement, Ontology Engineering, |
| − | |Ende= | ||
| − | |Finanziert von= | ||
| − | |Projektstatus= | ||
| − | |||
| − | |Person=Holger Lewen, Peter Haase, York Sure, | ||
| − | |Forschungsgruppe=Wissensmanagement | ||
| − | |Forschungsgebiet=Ontologiemodellierungsmethodology , Semantic Web Infrastructure, Semantic Web, Ontologiemodellierung, Ontologiemanagement, Ontology Engineering, | ||
| − | |||
}} | }} | ||
Aktuelle Version vom 16. September 2009, 09:19 Uhr
 |
Reuse of Ontologies - Advanced Ontology Rating with Protege |
|
Kontaktperson: k.A. |
The project is jointly performed by Universität Karlsruhe (TH) and Stanford University, CA, US. The basic idea of Open Rating Systems is to have a democratic approach to rating where anyone can review pieces of content. The real power of this approach lies in the concept of metarating: users can rate not only the content itself but also reviews of the content provided by others. Many people are now familiar with “Was this review helpful to you button on many rating sites. This concept has proven highly successful and is currently employed at Epinions , Slashdot , Amazon (in the user review section), iTunes (to review music), and other sites. The real benefit would lie in the integration into an ontology editor itself directly, because that is the place people will start looking for ontologies to reuse. The goal of the project is to enable reuse of ontologies by implementing an advanced open rating system as part of the well-known ontology editor Protege.
von: Januar 1, 2007
bis: Dezember 31, 2008
Finanzierung: DAAD
Ontologiemodellierungsmethodology, Semantic Web Infrastructure, Semantic Web, Ontologiemodellierung, Ontologiemanagement, Ontology Engineering DAAD PPP USA (Stanford) (Semantic Web Infrastructure, Ontologiemanagement, Ontologiemodellierung, Ontology Engineering, Ontologiemodellierungsmethodology, Semantic Web)