Article1612: Unterschied zwischen den Versionen
K (Added from ontology) |
K (Added from ontology) |
||
| Zeile 1: | Zeile 1: | ||
| + | {{Publikation Author | ||
| + | |Rank=2 | ||
| + | |Author=Elena Simperl | ||
| + | }} | ||
| + | {{Publikation Author | ||
| + | |Rank=3 | ||
| + | |Author=H. Sofia Pinto | ||
| + | }} | ||
{{Publikation Author | {{Publikation Author | ||
|Rank=1 | |Rank=1 | ||
| Zeile 6: | Zeile 14: | ||
|Rank=4 | |Rank=4 | ||
|Author=Rudi Studer | |Author=Rudi Studer | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
}} | }} | ||
{{Article | {{Article | ||
| Zeile 31: | Zeile 31: | ||
|VG Wort-Seiten=14 | |VG Wort-Seiten=14 | ||
|DOI Name= | |DOI Name= | ||
| − | |||
|Projekt=NeOn, | |Projekt=NeOn, | ||
|Forschungsgruppe= | |Forschungsgruppe= | ||
| + | }} | ||
| + | {{Forschungsgebiet Auswahl | ||
| + | |Forschungsgebiet=Ontology Engineering | ||
| + | }} | ||
| + | {{Forschungsgebiet Auswahl | ||
| + | |Forschungsgebiet=Semantic Web | ||
| + | }} | ||
| + | {{Forschungsgebiet Auswahl | ||
| + | |Forschungsgebiet=Ontologiemodellierung | ||
| + | }} | ||
| + | {{Forschungsgebiet Auswahl | ||
| + | |Forschungsgebiet=Ontologiemodellierungsmethodology | ||
}} | }} | ||
Version vom 15. August 2009, 16:53 Uhr
Argumentation-Based Ontology Engineering
Argumentation-Based Ontology Engineering
Veröffentlicht: 2007 November
Journal: IEEE Intelligent Systems
Nummer: 6
Verlag: IEEE
Volume: 22
Bemerkung: to appear
Referierte Veröffentlichung
Kurzfassung
This article applies the theory of argumentation to ontology engineering. Recent research in ontology engineering has highlighted the importance of controlled discussions for creating commonly agreed-on and widely accepted ontologies. The article analyzes how agreement is reached in the context of ontology development using rhetorical structure theory and identifies the most frequently used argument types. Case study-based investigations have shown that restricting the set of arguments participants use to express their positions can significantly facilitate reaching an agreement. The DILIGENT argumentation framework, consisting of a process, a formal model and a support tool, was built on the basis of these empirical findings. The formal model complies to the IBIS methodology, which was adapted to the ontology-specific requirements. It helps capture and record the design deliberations in ontology-engineering discussions, makes consensus building tasks more efficient, and provides detailed guidance for non-experts. The authors successfully evaluated the framework in several case studies.
ISSN: 1541-1672
VG Wort-Seiten: 14
Ontologiemodellierung, Ontology Engineering, Ontologiemodellierungsmethodology, Semantic Web