Inproceedings1829: Unterschied zwischen den Versionen
K (Added from ontology) |
K (Added from ontology) |
||
Zeile 1: | Zeile 1: | ||
+ | {{Publikation Author | ||
+ | |Rank=2 | ||
+ | |Author=Sebastian Rudolph | ||
+ | }} | ||
{{Publikation Author | {{Publikation Author | ||
|Rank=3 | |Rank=3 | ||
|Author=Pascal Hitzler | |Author=Pascal Hitzler | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
}} | }} | ||
{{Publikation Author | {{Publikation Author | ||
Zeile 26: | Zeile 26: | ||
|Abstract=We introduce ELP as a decidable fragment of the Semantic Web Rule Language (SWRL) that admits reasoning in polynomial time. ELP is based on the tractable description logic EL++, and encompasses an extended notion of the recently proposed DL rules for that logic. Thus ELP extends EL++ with a number of features introduced by the forthcoming OWL 2, such as disjoint roles, local reflexivity, certain range restrictions, and the universal role. We present a reasoning algorithm based on a translation of ELP to Datalog, and this translation also enables the seamless integration of DL-safe rules into ELP. While reasoning with DL-safe rules as such is already highly intractable, we show that DL-safe rules based on the Description Logic Programming (DLP) fragment of OWL 2 can be admitted in ELP without losing tractability. | |Abstract=We introduce ELP as a decidable fragment of the Semantic Web Rule Language (SWRL) that admits reasoning in polynomial time. ELP is based on the tractable description logic EL++, and encompasses an extended notion of the recently proposed DL rules for that logic. Thus ELP extends EL++ with a number of features introduced by the forthcoming OWL 2, such as disjoint roles, local reflexivity, certain range restrictions, and the universal role. We present a reasoning algorithm based on a translation of ELP to Datalog, and this translation also enables the seamless integration of DL-safe rules into ELP. While reasoning with DL-safe rules as such is already highly intractable, we show that DL-safe rules based on the Description Logic Programming (DLP) fragment of OWL 2 can be admitted in ELP without losing tractability. | ||
|VG Wort-Seiten= | |VG Wort-Seiten= | ||
− | |Download= | + | |Download=2008_1829_Krötzsch_ELP_Tractable__1.pdf, 2008_1829_Krötzsch_ELP_Tractable__2.pdf |
|Link=http://korrekt.org/page/ELP:_Tractable_Rules_for_OWL_2 | |Link=http://korrekt.org/page/ELP:_Tractable_Rules_for_OWL_2 | ||
|DOI Name= | |DOI Name= | ||
− | | | + | |Projekt=ReaSem, Active, NeOn, |
− | |||
|Forschungsgruppe= | |Forschungsgruppe= | ||
+ | }} | ||
+ | {{Forschungsgebiet Auswahl | ||
+ | |Forschungsgebiet=Wissensrepräsentationssprachen | ||
+ | }} | ||
+ | {{Forschungsgebiet Auswahl | ||
+ | |Forschungsgebiet=Beschreibungslogik | ||
+ | }} | ||
+ | {{Forschungsgebiet Auswahl | ||
+ | |Forschungsgebiet=Semantic Web | ||
+ | }} | ||
+ | {{Forschungsgebiet Auswahl | ||
+ | |Forschungsgebiet=Logik | ||
+ | }} | ||
+ | {{Forschungsgebiet Auswahl | ||
+ | |Forschungsgebiet=Logikprogrammierung | ||
+ | }} | ||
+ | {{Forschungsgebiet Auswahl | ||
+ | |Forschungsgebiet=Komplexitätstheorie | ||
}} | }} |
Version vom 15. August 2009, 20:08 Uhr
ELP: Tractable Rules for OWL 2
ELP: Tractable Rules for OWL 2
Published: 2008
Oktober
Herausgeber: Amit Sheth and Steffen Staab and Mike Dean and Massimo Paolucci and Diana Maynard and Timothy Finin and Krishnaprasad Thirunarayan
Buchtitel: Proceedings of the 7th International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC 2008)
Ausgabe: 5318
Reihe: LNCS
Seiten: 649-664
Verlag: Springer
Referierte Veröffentlichung
BibTeX
Kurzfassung
We introduce ELP as a decidable fragment of the Semantic Web Rule Language (SWRL) that admits reasoning in polynomial time. ELP is based on the tractable description logic EL++, and encompasses an extended notion of the recently proposed DL rules for that logic. Thus ELP extends EL++ with a number of features introduced by the forthcoming OWL 2, such as disjoint roles, local reflexivity, certain range restrictions, and the universal role. We present a reasoning algorithm based on a translation of ELP to Datalog, and this translation also enables the seamless integration of DL-safe rules into ELP. While reasoning with DL-safe rules as such is already highly intractable, we show that DL-safe rules based on the Description Logic Programming (DLP) fragment of OWL 2 can be admitted in ELP without losing tractability.
Download: Media:2008_1829_Krötzsch_ELP_Tractable__1.pdf,Media:2008_1829_Krötzsch_ELP_Tractable__2.pdf
Weitere Informationen unter: Link
Wissensrepräsentationssprachen, Beschreibungslogik, Komplexitätstheorie, Logik, Logikprogrammierung, Semantic Web