Inproceedings3290: Unterschied zwischen den Versionen
Aus Aifbportal
Fke (Diskussion | Beiträge) |
Ja9784 (Diskussion | Beiträge) |
||
Zeile 32: | Zeile 32: | ||
|Year=2012 | |Year=2012 | ||
|Month=Juni | |Month=Juni | ||
− | |Booktitle= | + | |Booktitle=Web Science Conference (WebSci) |
|Publisher=ACM | |Publisher=ACM | ||
− | |||
}} | }} | ||
{{Publikation Details | {{Publikation Details | ||
− | |Abstract=Sustained contributions of numerous authors are the building blocks of Wikipedia, the largest collection of publicly available knowledge. Downsides of the heterogeneous editor community are opinions, sentiments and mistakes of individuals that harm the neutrality of Wikipedia. We present our work in progress on a Knowledge Diversity Dashboard that empowers users to monitor and manage various aspects of diversity, biases, and sentiments in articles | + | |Abstract=Sustained contributions of numerous authors are the building blocks of Wikipedia, the largest collection of publicly available knowledge. Downsides of the heterogeneous editor community are opinions, sentiments and mistakes of individuals that harm the neutrality of Wikipedia. We present our work in progress on a Knowledge Diversity Dashboard that empowers users to monitor and manage various aspects of diversity, biases, and sentiments in articles and that provides valuable guidance for curing these shortcomings. |
− | and that provides valuable guidance for curing these shortcomings. | ||
|Projekt=Render | |Projekt=Render | ||
− | |Forschungsgruppe=Wissensmanagement | + | |Forschungsgruppe=Web Science und Wissensmanagement |
}} | }} |
Aktuelle Version vom 15. Februar 2017, 19:16 Uhr
A Knowledge Diversity Dashboard for Wikipedia
A Knowledge Diversity Dashboard for Wikipedia
Felix Leif Keppmann, Fabian Flöck, Angelika Adam, Elena Simperl, Delia Rusu, Gerrit Holz, Anselm Metzger
Published: 2012
Juni
Buchtitel: Web Science Conference (WebSci)
Verlag: ACM
Referierte Veröffentlichung
BibTeX
Kurzfassung
Sustained contributions of numerous authors are the building blocks of Wikipedia, the largest collection of publicly available knowledge. Downsides of the heterogeneous editor community are opinions, sentiments and mistakes of individuals that harm the neutrality of Wikipedia. We present our work in progress on a Knowledge Diversity Dashboard that empowers users to monitor and manage various aspects of diversity, biases, and sentiments in articles and that provides valuable guidance for curing these shortcomings.
Projekt
Forschungsgruppe
Web Science und Wissensmanagement
Forschungsgebiet