Inproceedings3057: Unterschied zwischen den Versionen
Nni (Diskussion | Beiträge) (Die Seite wurde neu angelegt: „{{Publikation Erster Autor |ErsterAutorNachname=Nikitina |ErsterAutorVorname=Nadeschda }} {{Inproceedings |Referiert=False |BibTex-ID=DBLP:conf/ecai/Nikitina10 |T…“) |
Nni (Diskussion | Beiträge) |
||
| Zeile 14: | Zeile 14: | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Publikation Details | {{Publikation Details | ||
| − | |Abstract=Quality control is an essential task within ontology | + | |Abstract=Quality control is an essential task within ontology development projects especially when the knowledge formalization is partially automatized. In this paper, we propose a reasoning-based, interactive approach to support the revision of formalized knowledge. In this approach, the evaluation decisions taken by a human expert are propagated in order to automatically evaluate axioms and thereby reduce the number of axioms that have to be manually evaluated. Additionally, we propose a ranking technique to further increase the effectiveness of ontology revision and provide an evaluation in terms of effort reduction and computation time with encouraging results. |
| − | |Download= | + | |Download=ECAI2010.pdf, |
|Link=http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/978-1-60750-606-5-1097 | |Link=http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/978-1-60750-606-5-1097 | ||
|DOI Name=10.3233/978-1-60750-606-5-1097 | |DOI Name=10.3233/978-1-60750-606-5-1097 | ||
Version vom 27. Oktober 2010, 07:11 Uhr
Semi-Automatic Revision of Formalized Knowledge
Semi-Automatic Revision of Formalized Knowledge
Published: 2010
August
Buchtitel: ECAI
Seiten: 1097-1098
Verlag: IOS Press
Nicht-referierte Veröffentlichung
BibTeX
Kurzfassung
Quality control is an essential task within ontology development projects especially when the knowledge formalization is partially automatized. In this paper, we propose a reasoning-based, interactive approach to support the revision of formalized knowledge. In this approach, the evaluation decisions taken by a human expert are propagated in order to automatically evaluate axioms and thereby reduce the number of axioms that have to be manually evaluated. Additionally, we propose a ranking technique to further increase the effectiveness of ontology revision and provide an evaluation in terms of effort reduction and computation time with encouraging results.
Download: Media:ECAI2010.pdf
Weitere Informationen unter: Link
DOI Link: 10.3233/978-1-60750-606-5-1097