Inproceedings3030: Unterschied zwischen den Versionen
Rfi (Diskussion | Beiträge) (Die Seite wurde neu angelegt: „{{Publikation Erster Autor |ErsterAutorNachname=Schmidt |ErsterAutorVorname=Rainer }} {{Publikation Author |Rank=2 |Author=Axel Kieninger }} {{Publikation Author …“) |
Rfi (Diskussion | Beiträge) |
||
Zeile 16: | Zeile 16: | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Inproceedings | {{Inproceedings | ||
− | |Referiert= | + | |Referiert=True |
|Title=Meta-Services – Towards Symmetric Service-Oriented Business Ecosystems | |Title=Meta-Services – Towards Symmetric Service-Oriented Business Ecosystems | ||
|Year=2009 | |Year=2009 | ||
Zeile 25: | Zeile 25: | ||
{{Publikation Details | {{Publikation Details | ||
|Abstract=Service-Oriented Business Ecosystems (SOBEs) contain numerous procedures and rules that act upon services, but are not considered to be servic-es themselves. Thus an asymmetry is created by dividing SOBEs into first-class entities that are services and others that are not. This separation creates ineffi-ciency and conceals the value contribution of non-first-class entities. Using so-called meta-services it is possible to encapsulate procedures and rules homoge-neously as services, thus creating a symmetric architecture of the SOBE. This symmetric architecture allows reducing the administrative effort for SOBEs by reusing procedures and using a common administration for services and meta-services. Meta-services are a value factor often underestimated by service de-signers, but highly appreciated by service users. By defining meta-services, the possible interactions between customer and service provider can be defined clearly, including mutual expectations. E.g. it is possible to define the informa-tion due in the case of a complaint. Furthermore, meta-services allow to clarify the potential adaptations to changing requirements to the customer and thus to delineate the spectrum of flexibility offered. The transparency created by meta-services allows defining contracts in a more precise manner and thereby avoid-ing misunderstandings and deceptions on both sides. | |Abstract=Service-Oriented Business Ecosystems (SOBEs) contain numerous procedures and rules that act upon services, but are not considered to be servic-es themselves. Thus an asymmetry is created by dividing SOBEs into first-class entities that are services and others that are not. This separation creates ineffi-ciency and conceals the value contribution of non-first-class entities. Using so-called meta-services it is possible to encapsulate procedures and rules homoge-neously as services, thus creating a symmetric architecture of the SOBE. This symmetric architecture allows reducing the administrative effort for SOBEs by reusing procedures and using a common administration for services and meta-services. Meta-services are a value factor often underestimated by service de-signers, but highly appreciated by service users. By defining meta-services, the possible interactions between customer and service provider can be defined clearly, including mutual expectations. E.g. it is possible to define the informa-tion due in the case of a complaint. Furthermore, meta-services allow to clarify the potential adaptations to changing requirements to the customer and thus to delineate the spectrum of flexibility offered. The transparency created by meta-services allows defining contracts in a more precise manner and thereby avoid-ing misunderstandings and deceptions on both sides. | ||
+ | |Link=http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-530/ | ||
|Forschungsgruppe=Ökonomie und Technologie der eOrganisation | |Forschungsgruppe=Ökonomie und Technologie der eOrganisation | ||
}} | }} |
Version vom 28. Januar 2010, 16:21 Uhr
Meta-Services – Towards Symmetric Service-Oriented Business Ecosystems
Meta-Services – Towards Symmetric Service-Oriented Business Ecosystems
Published: 2009
Buchtitel: Second International Workshop on Enabling Service Business Ecosystems
Verlag: CEUR-WS
Erscheinungsort: Athen
Referierte Veröffentlichung
BibTeX
Kurzfassung
Service-Oriented Business Ecosystems (SOBEs) contain numerous procedures and rules that act upon services, but are not considered to be servic-es themselves. Thus an asymmetry is created by dividing SOBEs into first-class entities that are services and others that are not. This separation creates ineffi-ciency and conceals the value contribution of non-first-class entities. Using so-called meta-services it is possible to encapsulate procedures and rules homoge-neously as services, thus creating a symmetric architecture of the SOBE. This symmetric architecture allows reducing the administrative effort for SOBEs by reusing procedures and using a common administration for services and meta-services. Meta-services are a value factor often underestimated by service de-signers, but highly appreciated by service users. By defining meta-services, the possible interactions between customer and service provider can be defined clearly, including mutual expectations. E.g. it is possible to define the informa-tion due in the case of a complaint. Furthermore, meta-services allow to clarify the potential adaptations to changing requirements to the customer and thus to delineate the spectrum of flexibility offered. The transparency created by meta-services allows defining contracts in a more precise manner and thereby avoid-ing misunderstandings and deceptions on both sides.
Weitere Informationen unter: Link
Ökonomie und Technologie der eOrganisation