Article498: Unterschied zwischen den Versionen
K (Added from ontology) |
K (Added from ontology) |
||
| Zeile 1: | Zeile 1: | ||
{{Publikation Author | {{Publikation Author | ||
| − | |Rank= | + | |Rank=7 |
| − | |Author= | + | |Author=Andreas Witt |
}} | }} | ||
{{Publikation Author | {{Publikation Author | ||
| − | |Rank= | + | |Rank=3 |
| − | |Author= | + | |Author=Stefan Decker |
}} | }} | ||
{{Publikation Author | {{Publikation Author | ||
| − | |Rank= | + | |Rank=5 |
| − | |Author= | + | |Author=Hans-Peter Schnurr |
}} | }} | ||
{{Publikation Author | {{Publikation Author | ||
| − | |Rank= | + | |Rank=1 |
| − | |Author= | + | |Author=Dieter Fensel |
}} | }} | ||
{{Publikation Author | {{Publikation Author | ||
| − | |Rank= | + | |Rank=2 |
| − | |Author= | + | |Author=Jürgen Angele |
}} | }} | ||
{{Publikation Author | {{Publikation Author | ||
| − | |Rank= | + | |Rank=6 |
| − | |Author= | + | |Author=Rudi Studer |
}} | }} | ||
{{Publikation Author | {{Publikation Author | ||
| − | |Rank= | + | |Rank=4 |
| − | |Author= | + | |Author=Michael Erdmann |
}} | }} | ||
{{Article | {{Article | ||
| Zeile 39: | Zeile 39: | ||
|Abstract=Ontobroker applies Artificial Intelligence techniques to improve access to heterogeneous, distributed and semistructured information sources as they are presented in the World Wide Web or organization-wide intranets. It relies on the use of ontologies to annotate web pages, formulate queries and derive answers. In the paper we will briefly sketch Ontobroker. Then we will discuss its main shortcomings, i.e. we will share the lessons we learned from our exercise. We will also show how On2broker overcomes these limitations. Most important is the separation of the query and inference engines and the integration of new web standards like XML and RDF. | |Abstract=Ontobroker applies Artificial Intelligence techniques to improve access to heterogeneous, distributed and semistructured information sources as they are presented in the World Wide Web or organization-wide intranets. It relies on the use of ontologies to annotate web pages, formulate queries and derive answers. In the paper we will briefly sketch Ontobroker. Then we will discuss its main shortcomings, i.e. we will share the lessons we learned from our exercise. We will also show how On2broker overcomes these limitations. Most important is the separation of the query and inference engines and the integration of new web standards like XML and RDF. | ||
|VG Wort-Seiten= | |VG Wort-Seiten= | ||
| − | |Download= | + | |Download=2000_498_Fensel_Lessons_Learned_1.pdf, 2000_498_Fensel_Lessons_Learned_2.ps |
| − | |||
|Projekt= | |Projekt= | ||
|Forschungsgruppe= | |Forschungsgruppe= | ||
}} | }} | ||
Version vom 15. August 2009, 16:44 Uhr
Lessons Learned from Applying AI to the Web
Lessons Learned from Applying AI to the Web
Veröffentlicht: 2000
Journal: International Journal of Cooperative Information Systems
Nummer: 4
Seiten: 361-382
Volume: 9
Referierte Veröffentlichung
Kurzfassung
Ontobroker applies Artificial Intelligence techniques to improve access to heterogeneous, distributed and semistructured information sources as they are presented in the World Wide Web or organization-wide intranets. It relies on the use of ontologies to annotate web pages, formulate queries and derive answers. In the paper we will briefly sketch Ontobroker. Then we will discuss its main shortcomings, i.e. we will share the lessons we learned from our exercise. We will also show how On2broker overcomes these limitations. Most important is the separation of the query and inference engines and the integration of new web standards like XML and RDF.
Download: Media:2000_498_Fensel_Lessons_Learned_1.pdf,Media:2000_498_Fensel_Lessons_Learned_2.ps