Stage-oe-small.jpg

Article3037: Unterschied zwischen den Versionen

Aus Aifbportal
Wechseln zu:Navigation, Suche
K (Textersetzung - „Forschungsgruppe=Wissensmanagement“ durch „Forschungsgruppe=Web Science und Wissensmanagement“)
 
(Eine dazwischenliegende Version von einem anderen Benutzer wird nicht angezeigt)
Zeile 39: Zeile 39:
 
|Title=Key challenges for enabling agile BPM with social software
 
|Title=Key challenges for enabling agile BPM with social software
 
|Year=2011
 
|Year=2011
 +
|Month=Februar
 
|Journal=J. Softw. Maint. Evol.: Res. Pract.
 
|Journal=J. Softw. Maint. Evol.: Res. Pract.
 
|Publisher=John Wiley & Sons
 
|Publisher=John Wiley & Sons
|Note=to appear
 
 
}}
 
}}
 
{{Publikation Details
 
{{Publikation Details
Zeile 50: Zeile 50:
 
|DOI Name=10.1002/smr.523
 
|DOI Name=10.1002/smr.523
 
|Projekt=Active
 
|Projekt=Active
|Forschungsgruppe=Wissensmanagement
+
|Forschungsgruppe=Web Science und Wissensmanagement
 
}}
 
}}

Aktuelle Version vom 15. Oktober 2015, 11:48 Uhr


Key challenges for enabling agile BPM with social software


Key challenges for enabling agile BPM with social software



Veröffentlicht: 2011 Februar

Journal: J. Softw. Maint. Evol.: Res. Pract.


Verlag: John Wiley & Sons


Nicht-referierte Veröffentlichung

BibTeX




Kurzfassung
Business Process Management is called agile when it is able to react quickly and adequately to internal and external events. Agile Business Process Management requires putting the life cycle of business processes on a new paradigm. It is advocated in this paper that social software allows us to satisfy the key requirements for enabling agile BPM by applying the four features of social software: weak ties, social production, egalitarianism and mutual service provision. Organizational and semantic integration and responsiveness (of the business processes engineering, execution and management activities) have been identified as the main requirements for implementing an agile BPM life cycle. Social software may be used in the BPM life cycle in several manners and using numerous approaches. This paper presents seven among them and then analyzes the ‘support’ effects between those approaches and the underlying social software features, and the three requirements for Agile BPM.

DOI Link: 10.1002/smr.523

Projekt

Active



Forschungsgruppe

Web Science und Wissensmanagement


Forschungsgebiet