Stage-oe-small.jpg

Article2042: Unterschied zwischen den Versionen

Aus Aifbportal
Wechseln zu:Navigation, Suche
K (Added from ontology)
 
(4 dazwischenliegende Versionen von 3 Benutzern werden nicht angezeigt)
Zeile 14: Zeile 14:
 
|Referiert=True
 
|Referiert=True
 
|Title=Social Software for Business Process Modeling
 
|Title=Social Software for Business Process Modeling
|Year=2009
+
|Year=2010
 
|Journal=Journal of Information Technology
 
|Journal=Journal of Information Technology
|Note=(to appear)
+
|Number=25
 +
|Pages=308-322
 
|Publisher=Palgrave Macmillan
 
|Publisher=Palgrave Macmillan
 
}}
 
}}
Zeile 23: Zeile 24:
 
where the elicitation of the characteristics of a business process usually takes place in a collaborative fashion, the building of the nal, formal process model is done mostly by a single person. This paper presents the design and implementation of a Recommendation-Based Process Modeling Support System with social features." A process builder using this system will receive recommendations to complete or edit a formal business process model on the basis of previous usage of modeling fragments by her peers. Such features potentially improve the modeling process and, as such, the modeling outcome, i.e., the quality of the process model. This paper also contains an evaluation of the system's usage and effectiveness, which builds on an experimental design. It is shown
 
where the elicitation of the characteristics of a business process usually takes place in a collaborative fashion, the building of the nal, formal process model is done mostly by a single person. This paper presents the design and implementation of a Recommendation-Based Process Modeling Support System with social features." A process builder using this system will receive recommendations to complete or edit a formal business process model on the basis of previous usage of modeling fragments by her peers. Such features potentially improve the modeling process and, as such, the modeling outcome, i.e., the quality of the process model. This paper also contains an evaluation of the system's usage and effectiveness, which builds on an experimental design. It is shown
 
that process builders are inclined to follow up on the provided recommendations and that this will improve the semantical quality of the created model. However, information on peer usage of modeling fragments does not play a big role in selecting the recommendations being followed up. This paper ts within a stream of research that puts emphasis on the modeling process, rather than on the model artifact.
 
that process builders are inclined to follow up on the provided recommendations and that this will improve the semantical quality of the created model. However, information on peer usage of modeling fragments does not play a big role in selecting the recommendations being followed up. This paper ts within a stream of research that puts emphasis on the modeling process, rather than on the model artifact.
|VG Wort-Seiten=
+
|Link=http://www.palgrave-journals.com/jit/journal/v25/n3/full/jit200921a.html
|DOI Name=
+
|Forschungsgruppe=Betriebliche Informationssysteme
|Projekt=
 
|Forschungsgruppe=
 
 
}}
 
}}

Aktuelle Version vom 12. Mai 2011, 15:13 Uhr


Social Software for Business Process Modeling


Social Software for Business Process Modeling



Veröffentlicht: 2010

Journal: Journal of Information Technology
Nummer: 25
Seiten: 308-322
Verlag: Palgrave Macmillan


Referierte Veröffentlichung

BibTeX




Kurzfassung
Formal models of business processes are used for a variety of purposes. But where the elicitation of the characteristics of a business process usually takes place in a collaborative fashion, the building of the nal, formal process model is done mostly by a single person. This paper presents the design and implementation of a Recommendation-Based Process Modeling Support System with social features." A process builder using this system will receive recommendations to complete or edit a formal business process model on the basis of previous usage of modeling fragments by her peers. Such features potentially improve the modeling process and, as such, the modeling outcome, i.e., the quality of the process model. This paper also contains an evaluation of the system's usage and effectiveness, which builds on an experimental design. It is shown that process builders are inclined to follow up on the provided recommendations and that this will improve the semantical quality of the created model. However, information on peer usage of modeling fragments does not play a big role in selecting the recommendations being followed up. This paper ts within a stream of research that puts emphasis on the modeling process, rather than on the model artifact.

Weitere Informationen unter: Link



Forschungsgruppe

Betriebliche Informationssysteme


Forschungsgebiet